Home / Runwiv Editorial Policy
Who publishes this content
Editorial policy
Runwiv content exists to help runners and organisers understand live running, route planning, club operations, and race-day experiences.
See methodology
What to expect
- Articles must answer a real runner or organiser search intent
- Comparisons must be fair and avoid unsupported competitor claims
- Corrections should be made quickly when facts drift
- Thin, duplicate, or placeholder pages should not be indexed
- Archived articles with unresolved source or example concerns show a review notice until their evidence is checked
Publisher and authorship
Runwiv publishes these guides and comparisons to support its running platform. The Runwiv Editorial Team byline identifies the publisher; it is not a claim that an independently accredited coach, clinician or product-testing panel reviewed an article.
Evidence and editorial review
Sources are linked where factual claims need support. We distinguish a practical checklist or calculation from a product test, a customer result or a clinical recommendation. General running and health articles have not received independent clinical review.
Comparisons and product availability
Runwiv is the publisher and a product discussed in its comparisons. Competitor descriptions use linked official documentation rather than an implied hands-on test. Planned Runwiv features are labelled as pre-launch; a demonstration is not evidence that every app feature has shipped.
Corrections to the archive
During the September 2026 review, older articles containing unsupported anecdotes, medical claims, product promises or shopping recommendations were replaced. Overlapping URLs redirect to a relevant current guide. That replacement does not validate the original claims.
Commercial references
The reviewed guides do not rank products using unverified retail prices or invented test results. Any future affiliate relationship, sponsorship or paid placement should be disclosed where it appears. A link to another organisation is not a claim of endorsement.
Request a correction
Use the support page to send the article URL, the claim you believe needs correction and a primary source where available. A meaningful factual correction should update the article and its modification date. A formatting-only change should not be presented as new research.
Common questions
Are the health guides medically reviewed?
No independent clinical review has been completed. They provide general context and direct readers to relevant authoritative guidance.
Have you tested all the products mentioned?
No. Links to manufacturer documentation are evidence of documented features, not independent testing.
Are the testimonials in old articles verified?
Unsubstantiated stories and results from the archive were removed rather than presented as verified customer evidence.
Run together when Runwiv launches
Get email updates when the iOS and Android apps become available. The waitlist is free; no payment required.
By joining, you agree to receive Runwiv launch updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.
Try the spectator demo · Check product availability